Creating Partnerships for Public Services

HOME | ABOUT US | SERVICES | SECTORS | PEOPLE | NEWS | RECRUITMENT | RESOURCES | CONTACT US | FEEDBACK
Central Government's Service Contracts - Public Accounts Committee Report

The 17th Report of Session by the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee was published on 28 April 2009 following an investigation into the management of government service contracts. Service contracts range from IT deals to security, facilities management and various forms of outsourcing. In excess of £12 billion was spent by central government on service contracts in 2007-08; an estimated £240 million was spent on managing these contracts.

The report draws up nine key conclusions and recommendations, and makes the point that between £160 million and £290 million a year could be saved through better contract management. The conclusions and recommendations include:

Achieving value for money depends on effective contract management. Improvements would be made if responsibility is assigned to a single individual, whose responsibilities should include ensuring that all major service contracts have appropriate governance arrangements and documented contract management plans. Contract managers also need to be better supported.
Major service contracts should have performance measures which are updated as necessary to meet changing business requirements.
Financial penalties should be applied when contracts entitle central government organisations to invoke them. Even where services supplied were sub-standard, almost 40 per cent of managers currently choose not to apply financial penalties that they are contractually entitled to impose.
The value for money of service contracts needs to be routinely tested; all significant changes to major service contracts should be tested as a matter of course.
Risks associated with major service contracts should be reviewed and good practice risk management processes put in place, including risk registers and contingency plans. Too few central government organisations are taking such steps: over half of contracts were found not to have a contingency plan in case of supplier failure.
The Office of Government Commerce has not previously provided sufficient contract management guidance or monitoring of major suppliers. However, during 2009 it plans to issue further guidance and develop new training on contract management, and extend its monitoring of the major suppliers to government.

Recent episodes have demonstrated that failures by contractors can have a major impact on citizens, such as the late marking of SATS tests and the problematic payment of Educational Maintenance Allowances. The report concludes that outsourcing of services means central government’s role becomes one of contract management, and every effort needs to be made to avoid similar failings in future.

For more information visit:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmpubacc/152/152.pdf

For More Information Contact:
David Wall
TPP Law Limited
53 Great Suffolk Street
London SE1 ODB

t 020 7620 0888
f 020 7620 0778
e info@tpplaw.co.uk

Email: David

For a full printable version of this
article please
click here

ƒƒƒBACK

 Disclaimer  Privacy Statement

© 2010 TPP Law Limited

Friday, 10 September 2010